Determinants of Surgical and Medical Management in Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Care Center
Authors
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Background: Ectopic pregnancy is a life-threatening condition and a substantial contributor to maternal morbidity. Advancement in ultrasonographic and biochemical evaluation allows for earlier identification and a broader range of methods of managing the disease. Aim and Objective: To evaluate demographic, clinical, and biochemical predictors of the choice of management modality in ectopic pregnancy. Question for the study was as follows: Which patient characteristics are predictors of surgical in comparison to medical management of ectopic pregnancy? Methods: A hospital-based retrospective study of 101 patients who presented with ectopic pregnancy was performed. Demographic variables, parity, BMI, presenting symptoms, ultrasonographic characteristics, and the concentration of serum β-hCG were examined. Treatment with laparotomy, laparoscopy, or methotrexate was performed. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistic, chi-square, Fisher's exact, ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, Spearman correlation, and logistic regression. Results: Older age, high β-hCG, and multigravidad were independently associated with surgical intervention, namely laparotomy and salpingectomy. Primigravidae and early pregnancies were significantly more likely to receive salpingostomy or medical therapy. BMI had no independent effect on management. Logistic regression identified parity (3.2, 1.6–6.5) and β-hCG >2000 IU/L (4.8, 2.0–11.2) as independent predictors of surgical intervention. Conclusion: Treatment of ectopic pregnancy is influenced by parity, β-hCG, and age, and parity and β-hCG are independent predictors. Patient-specific care remains a primary focus, and future application of predictive analytics and minimally invasive approaches may further maximize success.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2025 Shobana Ramasamy, Vidhyanandhini Paramanandhan, Preethi Vasanthkumar, Jothikala C, Swathi N, Jamila Hameed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License All articles published in Annals of Medicine and Medical Sciences are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Shobana Ramasamy, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Headquarters Hospital, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Headquarters Hospital, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Preethi Vasanthkumar, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Headquarters Hospital, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Headquarters Hospital, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Jothikala C, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Headquarters Hospital, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, District Headquarters Hospital, Pollachi, Tamil Nadu, India.
Swathi N, Statistician, Department of Medical Research, Karuna Medical College, Vilayodi, Chittur, Palakkad, Kerala, India.
Statistician, Department of Medical Research, Karuna Medical College, Vilayodi, Chittur, Palakkad, Kerala, India.
Jamila Hameed, Emiratus Professor, Research Mentor, Karuna Medical College, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Kerala, India
Emiratus Professor, Research Mentor, Karuna Medical College, Kerala University of Health Sciences, Kerala, India
[1] Agdi M, Tulandi T. Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2009;23(4):519–527. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.12.009.
[2] Van Mello NM, Zietse CS, Mol F, et al. Severe maternal morbidity in ectopic pregnancy is not associated with maternal factors but may be associated with quality of care. Fertility and Sterility. 2012;97(3):623-629. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.12.021.
[3] Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002 Dec;17(12):3224-30.
[4] Leach RE, Ory SJ. Management of ectopic pregnancy. Am Fam Physician. 1990 Apr;41(4):1215-22.
[5] Skubisz MM, Tong S. The evolution of methotrexate as a treatment for ectopic pregnancy and gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a review. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:637094. doi: 10.5402/2012/637094.
[6] Fan YY, Liu YN, Mao XT, Fu Y. The prevalence of ectopic gestation: a five-year study of 1273 cases. International journal of general medicine. 2021 Dec 14:9657-61.
[7] Calcagno A, Londero AP, Haag T, Driul L, Bertozzi S, Grassi T, Marchesoni D, Manhes H. Surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy associated with predisposing factors of tuboperitoneal infertility. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 2013 Apr 1;22(2):97-103.
[8] Ozcan MC, Wilson JR, Frishman GN. A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy with salpingectomy versus salpingostomy. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):656-67.
[9] Chen L, Zhu D, Wu Q, Yu Y. Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study of 95 patients. International Journal of surgery. 2017 Dec 1;48:59-63.
[10] Di Gennaro D, Damiani GR, Muzzupapa G, Stomati M, Cicinelli R, Gaetani M, Schonauer LM, Di Naro E, Trojano G, Cicinelli E. Ectopic pregnancy: An overview. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2022;49(12).
[11] Wenjing L, Haibo L. Therapeutic effect of laparoscopic salpingotomy vs. salpingectomy on patients with ectopic pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in surgery. 2022 Oct 11;9:997490.
[12] Kostrzewa M, Żyła M, Kolasa-Zwierzchowska D, Szpakowski A, Stachowiak G, Szpakowski M, Wilczyński JR, Litwińska E. Salpingotomy vs salpingectomy–a comparison of women’s fertility after surgical treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy during a 24-month follow-up study. Ginekologia Polska. 2013;84(12).
[13] Arena A, Altieri M, Filipponi F, Degli Esposti E, Franceschini C, Virgilio A, Palermo R, Youssef A, Seracchioli R, Casadio P. When Two Coincidences are a Clue: A Retrospective Cohort Study Regarding the Incidence of Ruptured Tubal Pregnancies in a Northern Italy Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2022 Nov 14;49(11):251.
[14] Baggio S, Garzon S, Russo A, Ianniciello CQ, Santi L, Laganà AS, Raffaelli R, Franchi M. Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2021 Jan;303(1):259-68.
[15] Rodrigues SP, de Burlet KJ, Hiemstra E, Twijnstra AR, van Zwet EW, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Jansen FW. Ectopic pregnancy: when is expectant management safe?. Gynecological Surgery. 2012 Nov;9(4):421-6.
[16] Solangon SA, Van Wely M, Van Mello N, Mol BW, Ross JA, Jurkovic D. Methotrexate vs expectant management for treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: An individual participant data meta‐analysis. Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica. 2023 Sep;102(9):1159-75.
[17] Colombo GE, Leonardi M, Armour M, Di Somma H, Dinh T, da Silva Costa F, Wong L, Armour S, Condous G. Efficacy and safety of expectant management in the treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Open. 2020 Oct 25;2020(4)
[18] Mullany K, Minneci M, Monjazeb R, C Coiado O. Overview of ectopic pregnancy diagnosis, management, and innovation. Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231160349
[19] Düz SA. Fertility outcomes after medical and surgical management of tubal ectopic pregnancy. Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Feb;60(3) 347-353.
[20] Al Naimi A, Moore P, Brüggmann D, Krysa L, Louwen F, Bahlmann F. Ectopic pregnancy: a single-center experience over ten years. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Jun 1;19(1):79.