Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Breast Pathology: Insights from a Meta-Analyses of FNAC and TCB
Authors
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Background: The Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Tru-Cut Biopsy (TCB) are significant investigative techniques used to differentiate breast issues. There is much research done on how well the two techniques complement each other. Aim and objective: The systematic review and meta-analyses aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of FNAC with TCB in breast pathology by conducting a meta-analysis of ten studies from 2017 to 2024 and answer the question: “How far we can trust FNAC alone in the diagnosis of breast lump alone? What are the cases when we can opt for FNAC alone or combine it with TCB and how do we individualize each case?”. Methods: The systematic literature review and meta-analyses using various databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were performed. Predesigned criteria-based studies were retrieved, with special emphasis on comparing FNAC with TCB in breast lesions. Data were retrieved for sample size evaluation, diagnosis outcomes, and tissue analysis correlations. Finally, ten studies were included. Results: The research found that TCB was more sensitive (average %) and specific (average %) compared with FNAC (average sensitivity %, specificity %). TCB also indicated fewer unsatisfactory specimens and misdiagnoses, especially with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Conclusions: TCB is more precise than FNAC in the diagnosis of breast lesions, especially regarding sensitivity and specificity. The evidence is in favor of recommending TCB as a first-line diagnostic test in clinical practice, especially in suspicious breast masses. However, the two techniques complement each other and proved to be crucial in the effective diagnosis of the condition.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright (c) 2025 Satheesh Kumar M, Visakan M, Shahul Hameed, Thahseen T, Jamila Hameed

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Creative Commons License All articles published in Annals of Medicine and Medical Sciences are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
[1] Azamjah N, Soltan-Zadeh Y, Zayeri F. Global trend of breast cancer mortality rate: a 25-year study. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP. 2019;20(7):2015.
[2] Yip SW, Griffith JF, Chan RC, Tong CS, Hung EH, Ng AW et al. Ultrasound-guided lymph node sampling: accuracy of FNAC, end-cutting (Franseen), and side-cutting (Temno) needle biopsy techniques. Clinical Radiology. 2022 Jun 1;77(6):466-73.
[3] Falah SQ, Bashir I, Marwat AA, Shams A. Trucut biopsy as a first line diagnostic modality for equivocal or suspicious breast masses: an experience from a teaching hospital in Khyber Pukhtunkhwa. Biomedica. 2021 Sep 30;37(3).
[4] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsDeclaracion PRISMA 2020: una guia actualizada para la publicacion de revisiones sistematicas. Revista panamericana de salud publica= Pan American journal of public health. 2022 Dec 30;46:e112.
[5] Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell DA, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. The Ottawa Hospital. Research institute.
[6] Ajitha M, Babu V, Singh A. Comparative study of fine needle aspiration cytology, trucut biopsy and final histopathological examination in breast lumps. Int J Biomed Res. 2017;8(3):34-5.
[7] Memişoğlu E, Sarı R, Tosun Y, Taşdoğan B, Rona G. Diagnostic efficacy of physical examination and radiological findings in palpable breast masses. Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory. 2022 Jun 6;13(2):269-74.
[8] Günes ME. Comparison of the ultrasound-guided tru-cut biopsy with postoperative histopathology results in patients with breast mass. Annali italiani di chirurgia. 2018 Jan 1;89:30-5.
[9] Iqbal S, Tabassum S, Khan Z. Role of Triple Test in Evaluating Breast Lumps. Lietuvos chirurgija. 2023 May 2;22(2):81-7.
[10] Swain N, Behera BK, Majhi S, Nayak M. A Comparative Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, Trucut Needle Biopsy & Imprint Cytology and Histopathology in Breast lumps. Annals of International Medical and Dental Research. 2017;3(3):20.
[11] Vinod K, Aroul T, Vaithi KA. Diagnostic Utility of Imprint Cytology for Assessment of Breast Lumps. Journal of Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences University. 2022 Jul 1;17(3):709-12.
[12] Mushtaq M, Singh G, Mushtaq F, Kapoor M. Pre-operative assessment of palpable breast lump–a comparative study of trucut biopsy & fine needle aspiration cytology.
[13] Swadi FM. Assessment of specificity and sensitivity of tru-cut biopsy as compared with postoperative histopathological results in young females with breast mass. Intl. J. 2022;2(4):14-21.
[14] Debnath BC, Ghosh A, Chowdhury AK, Jahangir R, Alam F, Joardar AI et al. Comparing of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) and Tru-cut biopsy for the Diagnosis of Breast Pathology. Journal of National Institute of Neurosciences Bangladesh. 2021 Jan 1;7(1):33-7.
[15] Acar HZ, Özer N. Are serum molecular markers more effective than the invasive methods used in the diagnosis of breast cancers?. Turkish Journal of Biochemistry. 2021 Dec 30;46(6):671-7.
[16] Hossain SM, Islam MB, Ali MS, Islam I, Naz N. Comparative Study of Tru-Cut Biopsy and FNAC in A Clinically Palpable Breast Lump. Ibrahim Cardiac Medical Journal. 2021;11(1):21-7.
[17] Tripathi K, Yadav R, Maurya SK. A comparative study between fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy in diagnosing clinically palpable breast lumps. Cureus. 2022 Aug 5;14(8).
[18] Noor BA, Shahid MA, Butt S, Afzal MU, Zafar AF, Ahmed HZ. Diagnostic Accuracy of FNAC for Detection of Malignancy in Palpable Breast Lump and its Comparison with Tru-Cut Biopsy. Pakistan Journal of Medical & Health Sciences. 2022 Nov 4;16(09):368.
[19] Agarwal NK, Choudhury DN, Minocha A. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology, Triple Test and Tru-cut Biopsy in the Detection of Breast Lesion. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Care. 2023 Sep 12;8(3):539-43.
[20] Suhas SR, Amar DN. Tru-Cut Biopsy versus Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in Diagnosis of Early Breast Cancer.2023.
[21] Khatun M, Rahman MM, Islam MR, Hossain MM. Diagnostic Usefulness of Tru-Cut Needle Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Lump. SAS J Surg. 2023 Sep;9:797-803.
[22] Butt MJ, Rahman UA, Ahmed I, Niaz CM, Iftikhar MA, Yousaf H. A Comparison of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) with Tru-cut Biopsy in Breast Lump Patients Taking Histopathology as Gold Standard.
[23] Sundaram SS, Kumar SV, Rajasekar AD, Nagam A. Comparison of Ultrasound, Trucut Biopsy, and Their Combined Accuracy with Postoperative Biopsy in Breast Lumps. Journal of Surgical Specialties and Rural Practice. 2024 May 1;5(2):52-6.
[24] Siddique R, Sinha A, Adhikary M, Phukan JP. Comparative Study of Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology and Needle Core Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Breast Lumps with Histopathological Correlation. Journal of the Scientific Society. 2022 Jan 1;49(1):70-5.